Rumi isn't inviting us to abandon judgment altogether—he's describing the exhaustion that comes from meeting another person across a courtroom of blame. The field he imagines is less about moral relativism than about the possibility of genuine encounter, the kind that can't happen when both parties are locked in defending their position. When you've had a conversation with someone you love where you stopped asking "who was right?" and started asking "what are we both afraid of?"—that's the field. It's where reconciliation actually begins, not in forgetting the hurt, but in choosing to meet someone as a whole person rather than as a defendant.