The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.
Skinner was poking at something more uncomfortable than mere anxiety about artificial intelligence—he was suggesting that we've become so passive in our thinking, so content to let habit and stimulus guide us, that we've already surrendered the very faculty we claim to fear losing. The real sting isn't that machines might become conscious someday; it's that humans have stopped exercising the deliberate thought required to distinguish themselves from machines in the present moment. When you catch yourself mindlessly scrolling through your phone while someone speaks to you, or repeating an opinion without having examined it, you're witnessing exactly what Skinner meant: not a technological problem, but a human one. His warning invites us to ask whether our celebrated intelligence is something we're actually *using*, or merely something we've inherited and taken for granted.